Home >
Alerts &
Updates
>
2020 Bill Tracking Page >
HB
3009: Forced Vaccinations by Local Tyrants!
Thanks to people like you, HB 3009 died in the house.
HB 3009:
Forced Vaccinations by Local Tyrants!
Threat briefing last updated:
4/24/2020 at 7:44p
"Reload" this page to see latest version.
Summary:
House Bill
3009 (HB 3009) is worse than originally exposed.
In addition to leaving current bureaucratic powers of local
health departments intact, it creates and
expands sweeping new statutory powers
that can be exercised by any county or municipal regime.
The inmates are running
the asylum... and driving Utah and America off the cliff of no return. |
Under the new term "local orders of constraint,"
a mayor, or even
an unelected city manager, could order Citizens to be forcibly
vaccinated, medicated, incarcerated,
have their firearms seized, and their
other property stolen.
Current statutory religious exemptions,
firearms exemptions, or requirements that public hearings and/or judicial review be
conducted, would NOT apply.
HB 3009 also empowers local "heath" departments to
issue "civil" fines related to these new, sweeping
powers, to punish those who refuse to bow down
to their unconscionable abuses —
again without
meaningful due process protections.
HB 3009 represents ACTS OF EXTREME AGGRESSION against the
People of Utah, their freedoms, and everything America once
stood for. It manufactures another diabolical mechanism
for regimes to strip innocent Citizens of their natural rights
to free movement, association, property, health care, and
self-defense.
Position: UT Gun
Rights opposes this bill.
Status: Thanks to people like you,
HB 3009 died in the house. See its
bill status page.
Action: Find
and contact your
house,
senate, and
executive branch
officials.
Call, text, and email them with your feelings about this bill,
and the fact that it was even presented. Be
cautious in how you express yourself, especially now, by
being
aware of the following warnings.
Sponsors:
Timothy Hawkes ("Republican")
in the house, and
Jacob Anderegg ("Republican") in the senate.
Threat Assessment
Jump down to any topic:
Peaceful Disclaimer
Piling Fuel on a Simmering Inferno
Current Code is Bad Enough
States of Emergency
Local Health
Department Powers & Protections
New "Local Order of Constraint" is Terrifying
Insane Bureaucratic Power Trips
"Civil" Court Entrapment
Fake Opposition Reveal True Colors
Utah's Big-Mouthed Sheriffs Nowhere to be
Found
Libertas Institute a Servile
Tool for Regime
Malevolent Clown Show in Progress
Appropriate PEACEFUL Action
Long food lines in
states like Alabama are coming to Utah. |
Peaceful Disclaimer
First, a serious disclaimer... The following analysis
does NOT
constitute
a threat of violence, and should NOT, in any
way, be
perceived as one. According to UT Gun Rights'
Organizational Policies:
"Peaceful. UT Gun Rights does NOT condone
acts of offensive violence."
It is with a view toward peace that
UT Gun Rights offers the following blunt, sobering, real-world assessment of the
political crimes of Utah's sociopathic eliteg, and the growing
public sentiment against the tyrannical actions of their corrupt regime. UT Gun Rights is constrained ethically to
repeatedly sound the
following alarm:
Unless Utah officials quickly pull their collective heads out
of their asses, violent civil conflict and chaos may be an unavoidable
consequence.
Tens-of-thousands of Utahans have, without a shot fired, been
forced to abandon their livelihoods and essential activities.
Potentially hundreds-of-thousands more Utahans will soon
follow them.
Most Utahans recognize the dire threat of
supply chain disruptions of vital goods and services.
They feel the suffocating decline of their meager, dwindling bank account funds,
as they frantically attempt to cope with this
largely-manufactured, "new normal" nonsense.
Apparently,
only the most NON-ESSENTIAL people in Utah
— politicians, lobbyists, and their so-called "experts"
—
are oblivious to the terrible storm on the horizon.
Back to
Topics
Utah's
NON-ESSENTIAL nobody. |
Piling Fuel on a Simmering
Inferno
As each day of "Martial Law Lite"
drags on, and
America's economic destruction becomes more assured, Utahans
will increasingly resist the hodge-podge mess of dehumanizing, absurd,
and intolerable usurpations of their natural rights.
Threats of passive disruption,
which has already been demonstrated in Salt Lake City, and even violent civil disobedience,
are real and continue to grow
exponentially.
Perhaps by design.
Rather than check Gary "Fudd"
Herbert's grotesque, outrageous seizure of unjust powers, the
statutarium (aka "legislature") seems intent on effeminately
enabling and coddling further tyrannical abuses.
Despicable bills like
HB 3009 are deliberately crafted to further erode evaporating
public trust and worsen the social tragedy unfolding.
The same corrupt politicans who
shovelled more gun control on Utahans during the 2020
legislative session are at it again
—
determined to further alienate the People they pretend to
serve.
Back to
Topics
Utah
already protects local tyrants. In 2017, Utah
Nurse Alex Wubbels was
violently arrested after refusing to draw blood
from an unconscious accident victim. Her
perpetrator, then-detective Jeff Payne, was never
charged with a crime. His supervisor, James
Tracy, is still employed with the SLC Police
Department.
|
Current Code is Bad Enough
As UT Gun Rights has attempted to warn over the years, this
regime
exploits real or manufactured crises to tighten its
regulatory noose around your freedoms.
Again, a cursory perusal of the
Bad
Bills enacted in 2020 general session provide ample
evidence of the disdain Utah's officials have for justice and
fairness.
As a result of years of such criminal behavior, state statute
has become a nightmarish mess.
States of Emergency
Current statute allows the governor to call a "state of
emergency" with some limitations. According to
53-2A-206(3), for example,
"A state of emergency may not continue for longer than 30 days
unless extended by joint resolution of the Legislature, which
may also terminate a state of emergency by joint resolution at
any time."
These declarations are supposed to be followed by
local officials without significant deviation. According
to
53-2A-205(1)(b):
"The chief executive officer may not take an action that is
inconsistent with any order, rule, regulation, or action of
the governor."
According to
53-2A-208, a chief executive officer may likewise declare
a local emergency. According to
53-2A-209(1), however,
"All orders, rules, and regulations... [issued by the chief
executive officer may] ...not [be] in conflict with existing
laws...."
There are, for example, many statutory restrictions provided
in
53-2A-205, with regard to evacuations.
Or in
53-2A-214, which prohibits additional
restrictions on, and confiscation of, a firearm or ammunition.
Utah
has been infected by a Chinese virus that is far
worse than the Coronavirus. |
Local "Health" Department Powers &
Protections
Current statute also provides broad latitude for local health
departments to boss people around. According to statute
67-1a-15, local health departments are considered a "limited
purpose entity."
(i) "Limited purpose entity" means a legal entity that:
(A) performs a single governmental function or limited
governmental functions; and
(B) is not a state executive
branch agency, a state legislative office, or within the
judicial branch.
These pseudo-governmental "entities" already enjoy broad,
alarming powers. From statute
26A-1-114:
26A-1-114. Powers and duties of departments.
(1) A local health department may:...
(b)
establish, maintain, and enforce isolation and quarantine,
and exercise physical control over property and over
individuals as the local
health department finds necessary for the protection of the
public health;...
(d) establish and operate
reasonable health programs or measures not in conflict
with state law which:
(i) are necessary or desirable for the
promotion or protection of the public health and the control
of disease; or
(ii)
may be necessary to ameliorate the major risk factors
associated with the major causes of injury, sickness, death,
and disability in the state;
(e) close theaters,
schools, and other public places and prohibit gatherings of
people when necessary to protect the public health...
[bold added]
This statutory language is vague enough to
drive a truck through. For example, what does, "...exercise
physical control over property and over individuals..." include?
Does that include forcing at blood test or vaccination? It
apparently would include shutting down, or seizing control of, any
business the local health department desires to close.
Statute
26A-1-123 also provides stiff penalties for those who
violate such decrees.
Pretty impressive powers for an "entity"
that isn't really a part of the three branches framework you
learned about in school, don't you think?
There are a few small roadblocks to the potential mischief by
local health boards, however.
For example, in the same chapter,
26A-1-121(1), local boards may NOT arbitrarily supercede, or be in conflict with, higher state agencies,
federal code, state statute, and state "administrative"
statute.
Before the local health boards can ignore those higher powers,
they must solicit public comment by holding a public hearing
of record that has been publicized.
Paragraph (2) of the
same section outlines an appeals process for "aggrieved"
persons with both the local board and also the judicial
branch. In other words, they have to theoretically abide
by a public process before they can do whatever they want.
Another roadblock to local health board tyranny exists in
the form of a "religious exemption" in
26A-1-124:
"This part does not authorize a local health department to
impose on any person any mode of treatment inconsistent with
the creed or tenets of any religious denomination of which the
person is an adherent, provided the person complies with
sanitary and quarantine laws, rules, and regulations."
It's a very weak exemption, but it does exist, and puts things
like mandatory vaccines, tests, and medicines into a greyer
area of statute that might trigger, and strengthen, the
ability to obtain relief from the aforementioned public input
and judicial review processes.
In truth, local health boards should NOT be
pseudo-governmental organs at all. They should be:
1) Part of the local government;
2) Stripped of nearly all their powers, and
3) Subservient to stringent public and judicial review processes.
Despite
bold claims by the Libertas Institute that HB 3009
restricts local health boards,
however,
all of the statutes described above are neither substantively
modified nor repealed
in HB 3009.
Instead, brand new mechanisms of perverse power are created that are
more frightening than existing statute.
Back to
Topics
New "Local
Order of Constraint" is Terrifying
An entirely new chapter (11-65) is enacted by HB 3009, and is
almost entirely separate and distinct from the statutes
discussed in the previous section.
Lines 76-77 of HB 3009 again reference county and city mayors, and even
unelected city managers, as "chief
executive officers."
Lines 79-83 grant these "chief executive officers" the
power to declare local emergencies:
(2) "Declared emergency" means, in accordance with Title
53, Chapter 2a, Emergency Management Act:
(a) a local emergency that the chief executive officer of
a municipality or county declares; or
(b) a state of emergency that the governor declares.
[bold added]
Here's where it gets crazy.
According to
lines 96-123,
these "chief executive officers," upon declaring a "local
emergency," may issue "local orders of constraint."
"Local orders of constraint" do NOT currently exist in
Utah statute. These orders can include almost anything, including,
* The establishment, maintenance, and
enforcement of isolation or quarantine (line 105);
* Stay-at-home orders (line 106);
* Physical control over property and over
individuals
(line 107);
* Closure of theaters, schools, or other public places (line
108), and
* Prohibition of gatherings of people (line
108).
Sounds a lot like the local health department orders in the
previous topic, don't they?
But they're not the same as the local health orders in 26A-1.
And they're not the same as the "chief executive officer's"
"state of emergency" declarations in 53-2A either.
In fact, they're a hybrid Beast of these two
mechanisms, but without the protections of either.
Here are some of the dangers of these "orders of constraint":
* These particular orders can remain in force for 14 days
without being ratified by the local legislative body, which is
somewhat different from 26A-1 and 53-2A.
* So long as the governor or local legislative authority do
NOT rescind it, there is no prohibition on reissuing the same
order again. Simply wait 5 minutes
after the order expires and then re-issue it for another 14
days. And repeat that process indefinitely.
* There is no requirement that the order comply with existing
law (as there is in
53-2A-209(1)).
* There is no required public hearing of record if the order
goes beyond existing law (as there is in
26A-1-121(1)).
* There is no appeals process for "aggrieved"
persons (as there is in
26A-1-121(2)).
* There is no judicial branch review requirement
(as there is in
26A-1-121(2)).
* There is no religious exemption specified
(as there is in
26A-1-124).
*
There is no prohibition
against additional restrictions on, and confiscation of, a
firearm or ammunition (as there is in
53-2A-214).
Updated 4/22/2020: Again,
"orders of constraint" are only defined in this new chapter
(11-65). They exist nowhere else in Utah statute.
Therefore, one must look at THAT new chapter (11-65) to DEFINE
this new mechanism (or tool) of power.
And just below this new "orders of constraint" mechanism is
the following superseding clause in
lines 125-128:
11-65-103. Relation to other law -- SUSPENSION.
(1) This chapter supersedes ANY conflicting provision
of Utah law.
(2) Notwithstanding ANY
other provision of law, the governor may NOT
suspend the application or enforcement of this chapter. [bold
and bold caps added]
In other words, "local orders of constraint" stand
independent, and above, anything else in existing statute, and
its described powers in this new chapter (11-65) must be
comprehended that way.
Not even the governor can "suspend the application or
enforcement" of these "orders of constraint."
[As was described below, he can only
modify or veto them AFTER
they are issued.]
Therefore, these local "chief executive officers"
could, through the power of exercising "physical control
over... individuals," (line 107), lock people up, forcibly
vaccinate and/or medicate them, seize their firearms, and subject them to whatever mistreatment and abuse they
wanted to
— all without substantive review
or protections available in other parts of Utah statute.
Lines 141-147 and elsewhere indicate that the governor
could modify or rescind such a "declared emergency," along
with any "local order of constraint."
But how often can
you imagine Gary "Fudd"
Herbert's effeminate veto pen stopping them? This is the
same
decrepid imbecile who publicly endorsed background checks for BB guns.
Or will you trust Herbert's replacement (if Utah actually
manages to hold a legitimate election)? How about
gubernatorial hopeful, "homegrown" political terrorist Spencer Cox, who
secretly collaborated with Herbert to destroy permitless
concealed carry? Would you bet on Cox suddenly
growing enough kahones to rein in the local tyrants?
The other potential roadblock is the local legislative body,
which can rescind these orders. But what if they are
prevented from meeting by the "chief executive officer"?
What if they are otherwise incapacitated? Or what if the majority of them are
controlled by bed-wetting Democrats and/or effeminate
Republicans?
Also, theoretically the legislature could NOT rescind such a
local "declared emergency" without first altering state
statute to allow themselves the power. But unless they
passed that future bill by a two-thirds majority, they would
be subject to a veto by the governor.
Starting to see
the mess the statutarium (aka "legislature") is creating yet again?
If they can't get their tyrannical agenda pushed through at
the state level, they will push it through piecemeal at the
local level.
Insane Bureaucratic Power Trips
According to
lines
351-361 of HB 3009, unelected local health department bureaucrats will
become Statute Enforcement Agents (SEAs) with the power to
directly fine innocent Utahans for defying these "local orders of constraint":
(1) In the case of a declared emergency related to a pandemic
or epidemic, in addition to imposing and enforcing an order of
restriction in accordance with Title 26, Chapter 6b,
Communicable Diseases - Treatment, Isolation, and Quarantine
Procedures, except as provided in Subsection (2), a
local health department may impose a civil penalty of up to
$1,000 for a violation of a chief executive's local
order of constraint that constitutes a stay-at-home order
if:
(a) the
individual has tested
positive for the pandemic or epidemic disease;
(b) the chief executive or local
health department has expressly directed the individual, in
writing, to comply with the stay-at-home order; and
(c) the
individual
violates the stay-at-home order.
(2) A
local health department may not impose the penalty described
in Subsection (1) if the individual leaves the individual's
residence to seek necessary medical attention.
[bold added]
Masked... Lines of those forced from their
jobs begin forming outside the Hialeah, Florida,
unemployment office. |
Aside from the paramount issue of natural rights,
and the absence of meaningful due process,
determining someone's guilt or innocence based upon a
"positive" medical test is asinine. For
example:
* Medical tests are
frequently wrong, or are incorrectly interpreted.
*
Studies are yet to be convincingly disproven suggesting
that COVID-19 tests produce high rates of "false positives."
*
Rampant fraud and lack of quality control continue to
plague testing;
*
World-renowned experts dispute whether these test have been
properly validated;
* The
disreputable World Health Organization (WHO) is
solely in charge of what constitutes an "approved" test,
and
*
In the case of COVID-19, it has been
officially and repeatedly acknowledged
that the majority of people who contract COVID-19
experience no, to mild, symptoms. Will we quarantine
indefinitely healthy people who resist a virus in favor of
the weak
—
who could self-isolate if they chose to?
And what if the individual
is hungry and needs to eat? Or must visit a sick
family member? Or desires to exercise any right associated
with keeping and bearing arms? Or wishes to protest the
tyrannical regime that is destroying his future?
Can you picture
your local "health" department communist partisan
listening to your pleas for mercy with a compassionate ear?
Justice is the furthest thing from their minds. |
"Civil" Court Entrapment
Speaking of two-bit Napoleons, how believable is it that a "civil,"
jury-less court dictator (aka "judge") would side with you
rather than a "social worker"?
In "civil" (i.e. NOT criminal) proceedings, there are
three potential "evidentiary standards," or levels of burden
which a prosecutor must "satisfy," in order for the court
(jury or jury-less) to rule against the accused/defendant.
The least protective (i.e. flimsiest) standard for the accused is
"preponderance of the evidence." That's
the standard you'll be subjected to. Here is one explanation
of this standard:
"This standard requires the jury to return a judgment in favor
of the plaintiff [aka "prosecutor"] if the plaintiff is able
to show that a particular fact or event was more likely than
not to have occurred. Some scholars define the preponderance
of the evidence standard as requiring a finding that at least
51 percent of the evidence favors the plaintiff’s outcome."
Source: "Evidentiary
Standards and Burdens of Proof," Justia, May 2019.
As UT Gun Rights discussed in
Courts of InJustice
versus Clark Aposhian, "civil" courts can easily be filled with
the testimony of government agents from various agencies.
If two or more agents testify that you, the accused/defendant,
were somehow violating their unjust commands, and your testimony
is all you have in your defense, guess who wins the 51%
challenge under "preponderance of the evidence"?
And what does "expressly directed the individual, in
writing,..." mean? A broad-brushed general edict posted
publicly will almost certainly be sufficient "warning."
Back to
Topics
With friends
like these.... |
Fake Opposition Reveal True Colors
"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The
summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis,
shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands
by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this
consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more
glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we
esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing
its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon
its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an
article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated."
— American revolutionary soldier and author,
Thomas Paine, The Crisis, 1776
In case you were comatose,
Utah is
America's fraud capital. Utah's capitol is a sick, degenerate "pay-to-play"
underworld, where your sacred rights are bought and sold like
playthings.
As a result,
Utah society has degenerated into a reeking carcass of "haves," "have nots,"
and those who sell their souls to enjoy the effeminate
graces of the "haves."
Utah's
Big-Mouthed Sheriffs Nowhere to be Found
Utah's sheriffs are full of tough talk
and bad-boy bravado regarding their supposed commitment to
defending the US Constitution,
Second Amendment, and the rights of Citizens.
They're "champions of the People," ready to stand against
tyranny wherever it reveals its ugly face, remember?
Take a hard look at the
Utah Sheriffs' Association official website. Peruse
the wonderful welcome message from their president, or their
exciting "Recent
News" page.
Can you find ANYTHING on their site about resisting the
tyranny engulfing Utah and America? Any notation, or even
footnote, regarding a single sheriff in Utah who is fulfilling his
oath of office?
Remember when
Utah County became Utah's first "Second Amendment Sanctuary"
a few months ago? Or
Uintah County a little while after that? Remember all
the
hooplah and fanfare they received from excited gun owners?
Utah is standing up to tyranny!
Well, certainly Utah's bold and brave sheriffs must be openly opposing Gary "Fudd"
Herbert's insatiable lust for power. They are surely rallying the People against
the open, unabashed tyranny right in front of their noses,
yes?
Sure about that?
Take a gander at the Utah County Sheriff's
official website and
Facebook page.
Or the Uintah County Sheriff's
official website and
Facebook page.
Any signs of life there? Even so much as a mousey peep of mild
discomfort?
Thousands of Utah
Citizens rallied big in
St George and
Salt Lake City last
week. Notice any sheriffs there leading the crowds with
impassioned speeches? None?
You shouldn't be
shocked. You should know by now that it's all bullshit.
Back in 2013, UT Gun Rights painstakingly revealed the truth
in, "Why Did Utah's Sheriffs Oppose HB 76?"
Utah's sheriffs openly
lobbied against a bill to
restore the right of citizens to carry firearms concealed,
even if the firearm were in an "unloaded" condition! Rather than own up to it when they were exposed publicly,
they
whined about it.
And lest you imagine Utah's police chiefs are any better,
read, "Utah
Police Chiefs Overwhlemingly Support Gun Control."
Collectively, they are at least as abysmal.
The heads of both the Utah Sheriffs' Association
and Utah Chiefs of Police Association sit on the
Utah Law
[sic] Enforcement Legislative Committee.
This secretive group is headed up by Utah attorney general
Sean "Rambo"
Reyes and
actively lobbies for gun control every session.
You think those effeminate cowards would stand up in
any meaningful way today? Well, when you run out of money to
purchase food, try dining on their campaign promises.
As US General George S. Patton (1885-1945) allegedly warned,
"Politicians are the worst; they'll wear their country's
flag in public, but they'll use it to wipe their asses in the
caucus room, if they think it will gain them a vote."
Over many years, it was repeatedly proven that Utah's sheriffs
are frauds, con artists, and pretenders. And Utah gun owners
tolerated it.
With "friends" like
these... |
Libertas Institute a Servile
Tool for Regime
The Libertas Institute has, once again, prepared a
woefully inaccurate analysis that shameless legislators are
regurgitating widely to cover up their
manipulation, deceit, and abiding contempt for the rule of
law, justice, and the People they pretend to serve.
Libertas' damage to the effort to kill HB 3009 is both significant
and instructive. For example, in an email to UT Gun
Rights, house member Brad Last, ended his response with the
following:
Connor Boyack, head of the Libertas Institute, an organization
the prides itself on protecting people's personal liberties,
wrote this article explaining HB 3009 and why his organization
supports it.
https://libertasutah.org/justice-and-due-process/hb-3009-restricting-local-governments-in-issuing-shutdown-orders/
I hope this information has addressed your concerns.
Regards,
Brad Last
Senate member Todd Weiler wrote:
The bill is dead but
The Bill is dead now but read this:
When dealing with these certifiable narcissists and
sociopaths, any individual or organization will make mistakes.
UT Gun Rights makes mistakes as well.
Providing cover for legislators is becoming a habit with
Libertas, however. In 2014,
they supported HB 276, which UT Gun Rights
repeatedly exposed as a massive attack on open carry gun
owners.
In 2018, Libertas president Connor Boyack
secretly met with top legislators and corporate lobbyists
to craft legislation dealing with medical cannabis.
Rather than invite public input, group members attempted to
deny the existence of their draft bill.
The results of that secret group was
HB 3001, Substitute 6, which was
enacted in a matter of hours of its release to the public
— without so much as a public hearing.
Boyack
publicly thanked his secretive co-conspirators, former
house speaker Greg Hughes and current senator Evan Vickers,
for their collaboration.
HB 3001 led to Boyack's collaboration on SB 1002 in 2019,
which UT Gun Rights reported on in, "Warning!
Utah's "Cannabis" Bill Designed to Entrap Gun Owners."
In other words, the entire effort has been a mess.
Rather than serve as the liveried manservant to NON-ESSENTIAL
political criminals and lowlifes, Libertas should seek
distance, objectivity, and clarity far from their nefarious
and corrupting influences.
Back to
Topics
The clowns in charge
aren't cute and cuddly. |
Malevolent Clown Show in Progress
The Coronavirus scare has highlighted the illegitimacy,
unethical amorality, and profound lack of credibility by those
who manage Utah and America. Here are a few examples:
Mask Mayhem. Americans were first informed
that
masks were useless and not to bother. Then that they
needed N95 masks anyway.
When people bought them anyway, they were berated for
purchasing them and told that
masks were only important for medical personnel. On
April 4, the
CDC announced that masks are recommended, and
some states now require masks.
Social Distance Follies. Originally, there
was no reason to keep one's distance. Then it was
6-feet, despite the fact that multiple studies (source
1,
source 2) indicated the likelihood that the virus could
travel much farther, and remain at infectious levels for
hours. Finally, it is now grudgingly admitted that the
more correct distance should be
several times 6-feet.
The CDC's clown show is
getting people killed, and destroying America's
future. |
CDC Fudging
Death Certificates. As reported by
Justice4all.blog, the
Center for Disease Control’s (CDC)
March 24, 2020, policy directs hospitals to list COVID-19
(i.e. Coronavirus) as the primary cause of death even if it is
merely, "assumed to have … contributed to death."
A positive test or solid evidence is NOT required, and
follow-up investigation is unlikely. This unheard-of policy
empowers the CDC to "cook the books" and thereby promote a
dangerous political agenda involving fear and panic.
This CDC policy was confirmed in the April 7, 2020,
White House press conference by Dr. Deborah Birx, Coronavirus
Response Coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task
Force,
who stated,
"If someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting
that as a COVID-19 death."
In other words, no matter what the cause of death, if the
victim has COVID-19, that is to be the primary cause listed on
the death certificate.
Utah's bizarre political
theater encapsulated in a single photo. [Note: This
is an undoctored photo taken in the Utah house.] |
Nationwide
Hospital Staff Layoffs & Cuts. First we hear
the impact on hospitals will be minimal. Later we hear
that hospitals will be overwhelmed with Coronavirus victims.
Elective procedures are postponed, and hospital spaces are
cordoned off, to "get ready for the surge." To such a
degree and scope that there isn't enough work to go around for
hospital staff.
The consequences include massive layoffs of doctors, nurses,
and other staff. See, for example,
* "During
a Pandemic, an Unanticipated Problem: Out-of-Work Health
Workers," By Ellen Gabler, Zach Montague and Grace
Ashford, New York Times, April 3, 2020.
* "A
Major Medical Staffing Company Just Slashed Benefits for
Doctors and Nurses Fighting Coronavirus," by Isaac
Arnsdorf, Pro Publica, March 31, 2020.
* "Thousands
of US medical workers furloughed, laid off as routine patient
visits drop during coronavirus pandemic," Kim Norvell and
Jayne O'Donnell, USA TODAY NETWORK, April 2, 2020.
* "Intermountain
will cut pay for doctors and nurse practitioners amid
coronavirus pandemic," Courtney Tanner, Salt Lake
Tribune, March 30, 2020.
Doing his best to
represent the "new abnormal." |
Pushing
Mandatory Vaccinations & Digital IDs. Rather
than admit that the Coronavirus never materialized in western
European nations as they had apparently hoped, the clown show
is intensifying with increasing talk of the need for
"solutions" like mandatory vaccines and digital IDs in order
to return to "civilized" life.
See, for example, Bill Gates, of Microsoft infamy:
* "Bill
Gates Calls for a 'Digital Certificate' to Identify Who
Received COVID-19 Vaccine," by Vigilant Citizen,
April 1, 2020.
* "Bill
Gates and his coronavirus conflicts of interest,"
by Cheryl K. Chumley, The Washington Times, April 2,
2020.
* "The
Dark Truth About Fauci and Birx, Bill Gates And Globalist
Elites," by Patrick Howley, National File, April
13, 2020.
* "Gates
Foundation calls for global cooperation on vaccine for 7
billion people," Paul Handley, AFP, April 15,
2020.
Cars wait in line for
the food bank in San Antonio, Texas. |
Out of Chaos, More Chaos. The result of all this panic, confusion, and chaos?
Twenty-two million Americans are jobless, and the
entire economy is on the verge of collapse.
The clowns in charge aren't friendly. They relish the
destruction happening around them, and couldn't care less
whether you eat or starve.
In Utah, statutators (aka "legislators"), Republican and Democrat,
continue to sell your rights in
their perverse "pay-to-play"
underworld.
These effeminate political criminals continue to demonstrate
why
Utah is
America's fraud capital.
Instead of reconnecting with the People of Utah,
NON-ESSENTIAL sellouts like "Available
Jones" Herbert are playing the fiddle while
Rome burns around them. They are, "...expressing
solidarity with the Chinese people...," and
ignoring their own People. They
adore, and
desire to emulate, the brutal communist Chinese regime,
and reject American jurisprudence.
Unlike the
terrorized Chinese peoples,
who are abused like animals and
subjected
to barbaric torture, however, Utahans
have managed to retain a portion of their natural rights to
keep and bear arms.
Back to
Topics
Behold the most
NON-ESSENTIAL group of lowlifes infesting
Utah with their poison. |
Appropriate PEACEFUL Action
The "emergency session" started April 16, 2020, and
ended on April 23, 2020.
Thanks to people like you, HB 3009 died in the house. See HB 3009's
bill status page.
Contact your officials: Find your
house,
senate, and
executive branch
officials. Call, text, and email them with
your feelings about this bill, and the fact that it was even
presented.
Be
cautious in how you express yourself, especially now, by
being
aware of the following warnings.
Recognize who runs the show:
House speaker Brad Wilson and
senate president Stuart Adams are running roughshod
over your state legislators. These two de facto
dictators set the
rules, dominate the entire process, and coerce others to bow
to their whims and wishes.
Learn more by reading, "Two
Bullies Steal Your Rights." UT Gun Rights will
provide additional resources soon.
Take additional actions:
It is past time for those who claim to desire peace to get off
their asses.
These insane sociopaths are about to finish driving Utah and
America into the abyss of no return.
Where are all of the men in Utah? Where are the leaders
who will rise up against these outrages? Why do they
remain, collectively, so silent and pandering?
For other peaceful actions you can
take right now, see the article, "What
You Can Do."
And keep watching UT Gun Rights'
2020 Bill
Tracking Page: The Good, The Bad, & the Ugly for
critical updates on special session bills and other threats.
Back to
Topics
Supplemental: Other Views
on HB 3009
Click here to consider Defending Utah's analysis and
opinion regarding HB 3009.
Back to
Topics
Click here to go back
to The 2020 Bill Tracking Page: The Good, The Bad, and The
Ugly. |
|
Sign
up for E-mail Alerts & Updates
To sign up for free alerts and updates,
email
info@utgunrights.com.
Also "Like" the UT Gun
Rights Facebook page and share it with your friends at
https://www.facebook.com/UtGunRights.
Copying Permission: Permission to reprint articles and
material in whole or in part is hereby granted provided that
UT Gun Rights is cited. Feel free to share this
information with others.
Disclaimer: The information on this site is for educational
purposes only. If there
are errors, email info@utgunrights.com.
Comments or
questions? Email
info@utgunrights.com.
Copyright © 2020 UT Gun
Rights
|
